TAPAN CHANDAR DAS AND 5 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
WP(C)/4156/2025 · 2025-07-31
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16474 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16474 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010163392025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4156/2025 TAPAN CHANDAR DAS AND 5 ORS. SON OF GANESH DAS R/O NIZ HASSANG NO. 1, P.O. MANDHUKUCHI, RANGIA DIST. KAMRUP (RURAL), ASSAM 2: SAHIDUL ISLAM SON OF SIRAJ ALI R/O VILL- TITKUR NO. 1 DIST. KAMRUP (RURAL) ASSAM 3: SRI AMAR CHANDRA SWARGIARY SON OF RATAN CHANDRA SWARGIARY R/O TITKUR DIST. KAMRUP (RURAL) ASSAM 4: SUSHILA DEVI WIFE OF TARUN SARMA R/O TITAKURI DIST. KAMRUP (RURAL) ASSAM. 5: MANU SWARGIARY W/O KISHAK SWARGIARY R/O TITKURI NO. 2
DIST. KAMRUP (RURAL) ASSAM 6: DIPANJALI DEK A W/O PINAK CH. DEKA R/O TITKURI NO. 2 DIST. KAMRUP (RURAL)
Page No.# 2/4 ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP (RURAL) AMINGAON ASSAM 3:THE CO-DISTRICT COMMISSIONER RANGIA KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER RANGIA CIRCLE
RANGIA KAMRUP (RURAL) ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BORA, MR. A GANGULY,MR TAPOBRAT CHHETRI Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, P AND R.D.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 01.08.2025 Heard Shri S. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Shri BJ Talukdar, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam assisted by Shri PK Medhi, learned counsel and Shri S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat and Rural Development Department. Also heard Shri HK Das, learned
Page No.# 3/4 counsel, who has appeared for certain incumbents, who are interested in this proceedings and were intending to file impleadment application. 2. The grievance of the petitioners, who are 6 in numbers, is non-convening of the first meeting of the elected Members of the 96 Haradutta Gaon Panchayat, Rangia Development Block. It is the case of the petitioners that they are elected from various Wards under the aforesaid Gaon Panchayat and though the meeting was scheduled, the same could not be held and no President and Vice-President have been elected. 3. When this matter was taken up for consideration on 28.07.2025, this Court had directed the learned State Counsel to obtain instructions. 4.
Shri Talukdar, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate has placed on record written communication dated 29.07.2025 issued by the District Commissioner, Kamrup whereby it has been stated that the first meeting was held on 09.07.2025 at 10:00 AM at the Irrigation IB, Chepti, Rangia and were conducted as per agenda in which the President and the Vice-President were elected amongst the Members. 5. The learned State Counsel has also submitted that along with instructions, all the requisite documents including the minutes of the meeting have been enclosed, which have been perused. 6. Shri HK Das, learned counsel has also informed that Shri Nripen Chandra Das and Shri Murmu Swargiary have been respectively elected as the President and Vice-President of the concerned Gaon Panchayat. 7. In view of the aforesaid instructions, this Court is of the opinion that there is no live cause of action to be adjudicated and accordingly the writ petition is closed. Page No.# 4/4
8. The written instructions dated 29.07.2025 along with all the enclosures are made part of the records. JUDGE Comparing Assistant