HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10778 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to provide work to petitioner in every season. 3. It has been submitted that earlier petitioner was engaged as Seasonal Collection Amin in the year 1988 has continued as such with satisfactory services but recently petitioner has not provided him with any work. It is submitted looking to the law services rendered by petitioner, such a prayer is being made. 4. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party no.2 i.e. District Magistrate, Sultanpur or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 4. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 15, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pratul Pratap Singh, Surya Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ram Raj .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench