Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:9818 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
W PMS/ 3 0 9 2 / 2 0 2 5 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.
Mr. Vinoda Nand Barthwal, Advocate for the petitioner, through video conferencing.
2. Mr. N.K. Papnoi, Standing Counsel for the State/ respondents.
3. Petitioner is resident of Village Kusyan, Tehsil and District Pauri Garhwal. According to him, a motor road, namely- Badkot Mandir to Khipladhar Gheru was constructed under District Plan during the financial years 2015-16 to 2018-19, over petitioner’s land, however, no amount has been paid to the petitioner as compensation.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that about 9 nali land belonging to petitioner was affected by the road construction work.
5. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs: -
“(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the concerned respondents compensation to give the precise compensation of the land acquired by the respondents belong to petitioner.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction appropriate in nature directing the respondent concerned to compensate the petitioner and further to take necessary action against the erring person who is instrumental on the same.
(iii) I ssue a writ, order or direction appropriate in nature directing the respondent concerned to compensate looking to future loss to the petitioners and further to take necessary action against the erring person who is
2025:UHC:9818 instrumental on the same.”
6.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has repeatedly made representation to the authorities concerned. The last representation was made on 27.10.2025. He confines his prayer and submits that Executive Engineer, Provincial Division, Public Works Department, Pauri be directed to take decision on the representation submitted on 27.10.2025.
7. Learned State Counsel submits that he has no objection if the writ petition is
disposed of in terms of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
8. The writ petition is, accordingly,
disposed of with a direction to the Executive Engineer, Provincial Division, Public Works Department, Pauri to take decision on petitioner’s representation dated 27.10.2025, as per law, within twelve weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.
( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)
07.11.2025
Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487d f006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA8 75643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.11.07 14:04:29 +05'30'