APHC010218722021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12622/2021 Between: 1. A SIVA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O LATE A.JANGAM REDDY, AGED. 65 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, RIO 4-152, KALYANADURGAM ROAD, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANANTAPUR RURAL POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 4. K CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO, S/O FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED. 65 YEARS, OCC. RTD EMPLOYEE, R/O 13-2- 60, RAMA CHANDRA NAGAR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action on the part of Respondent No.3 in calling the Petitioner for resolving civil dispute with respect to Plot Numbers 30, 31 in Survey Number 191 E, admeasuring an extent of 5 Cents situated at 2 Rachanapally (v), Anantapur (M), Anantapur District as same is illegal and arbitrary, unconstitutional, violative of rights of citizens envisaged under the articles of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent no.3 to not to call the Petitioner for resolving any civil dispute with respect to Plot Numbers 30, 31 in Survey Number 191 E, admeasuring an extent of 5 Cents situated at Rachanapally (v), Anantapur (M), Anantapur District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent no.3 to not to call the Petitioner for resolving any civil dispute with respect to Plot Numbers 30, 31 in Survey Number 191 E, admeasuring an extent of 5 Cents situated at Rachanapally (v), Anantapur (M), Anantapur District and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action on the part of Respondent No.3 in calling the Petitioner for resolving civil dispute with respect to Plot Numbers 30, 31 in Survey Number 191 E, admeasuring an extent of 5 Cents situated at Rachanapally (v), Anantapur (M), Anantapur District as same is illegal and arbitrary, unconstitutional, violative of rights of citizens envisaged under the articles of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent no.3 to not to call the Petitioner for resolving any civil dispute with respect to Plot Numbers 30, 31 in Survey Number 191 E, admeasuring an extent of 5 Cents situated at Rachanapally (v), Anantapur (M), Anantapur District and to pass...…” 2. Heard Sri N.Chandra Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that since the subject matter is civil in nature, the police authorities are not interfering in the civil disputes. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the matter before appropriate forum. 5. Having regard to the submissions of both the learned counsel and in view of the fact that there are civil disputes between the petitioner and the 4 unofficial respondent, this Court is of the considered view that no further orders are required in the present writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.09.2025 SNI 5 57 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.12622 of 2021 Dated: 17.09.2025 SNI 6