KRISHNA SHANKAR RAI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/10780/2025 · 2025-09-15
Manish Mathur
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164703 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164703 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10780 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been field seeking a direction to concerned authority to consider petitioner's transfer to his home District Ballia or to the adjoining district of Varanasi in terms of paragraph-5 (v) of the Government Order dated 06.05.2025 in view of the fact petitioner has less than two years to superannuate.
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party no.3 i.e. Additional Superintendent of Police, P.A.C. Head Quarter Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 15, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kapil Dev Chaubey, Amit Bhardwaj Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Krishna Shankar Rai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench