PRANJUL BAJPAI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NA528/1288/2025 · 2025-09-18
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164684 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164684 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1288 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Shri Kaustubh Singh, Advocate has put in appearance for the opposite party no. 2 and has filed his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State. 3. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (in short "BNSS") has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 04.12.2024 arising out of Case Crime No.0425 of 2024 under Sections 419, 420, 504, 506 IPC, P.S.- Gangaghat, District- Unnao as well as summoning order dated 01.03.2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Unnao in Case No.6551 of 2025; State Vs. Aman and Ors. 4. It is submitted that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise and a copy of compromise deed, duly signed by the parties, is annexed as Annexure No.4 to the present application. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Trial Court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Considering the aforesaid, this application is disposed of finally in following terms:- (i) The parties to the proceedings in issue shall appear and file the compromise before the concerned Court within four week's from today. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Tewari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pranjul Bajpai And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
(ii) If the parties appear before the concerned Court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record. (iii) The concerned Court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two week's from the date of production of copy of this order.
(iv) The concerned Court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise to the counsel for the applicants, after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned Court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. September 18, 2025 DiVYa NA528 No. 1288 of 2025 2
(Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench