Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 164670 (ALL)

MAYAWATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/9322/2025 · 2025-09-22

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9322 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Shri Shobhit Mohan Shukla, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent no.3. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "(i). issue Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opp Party No. 2 to execute the recovery certificate dated 02.08.2025 as expeditiously as possible ; (ii). issue Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opp. Party No.2 to execute to recover the interest amount calculated till date and may be pleased to order to handover the possession of the unit booked by the petitioner.." 3. Learned Standing counsel for respondents has raised preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition and submitted that the order has been passed by RERA at Gautam Budh Nagar, thus, no part cause of action has arisen within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court sitting at Lucknow. The writ petition would lie at High Court, Allahabad. 4. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court at Allahabad. September 22, 2025 Pks Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Swetank Sharma, Prashant Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shobhit Mohan Shukla (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Mayawati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench