AKHILESH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
BAIL/8808/2025 · 2025-09-17
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164616 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164616 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8808 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Ms. Jyoti Rawat, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Mayank Sinha, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.0580 of 2023, under Sections 452, 323, 436 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Kotwali Bikapur, District Faizabad / Ayodhya
3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 09.11.2023 against three persons, including the applicant, stating that all the accused persons entered the informant's house and they had beaten up the informant's grand son and set a thatched roof ablaze. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant's involvement in two other criminal cases has been disclosed in para 18 of the affidavit in which he has not received any summons or notice. 5. Both the co-accused Vanshraj Yadav and Kuldeep Yadav have been granted bail in the present case. Copies of their bail orders have been annexed with the bail application. 6. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail applicant and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during the investigation and a charge sheet has been submitted on 02.09.2025. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jyoti Rawat, Ram Samujh Rawat Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Akhilesh Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime on the ground of parity. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9. Let the applicant - Akhilesh Yadav be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court.
September 17, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 8808 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench