2025:UHC:8685 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/140/2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey and Ms. Sheetal Selwal, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The present applicant ‘Nadeem @ Shanu, son of Taufiq Ahamed @ Chuttan’ is praying for regular bail in relation to First Information Report dated 13.10.2024 bearing FIR No. 0413 of 2024, P.S. Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar, wherein, the present applicant and his two brothers and mother were implicated for the offences punishable under Section 80(2) of BNS, 2023 and on completion of the investigation, brothers of the applicant namely Shadab and Naushad were exonerated, however, chargesheet has been filed against present applicant and his mother Mariyam. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case and in fact, applicant married with the deceased on 30.01.2022 and she left her in laws’ house in the month of May, 2024 and since then, she was living in her maternal house. 5. He further argued that deceased died due to hanging in her maternal house due to depression and now, charge sheet has been filed as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation. He further submits that mother of the applicant has already been enlarged on bail by this Court by order dated 20.06.2025 and applicant is languishing in jail since 23.11.2024 and trial has already commenced and charges have already been framed. 6. On the other side, learned A.G.A. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, have not disputed this fact that the present applicant is languishing in jail since 23.11.2024 and trial has already commenced. 7. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into 2025:UHC:8685 consideration that the applicant is languishing in jail since 23.11.2024 and trial has already commenced, therefore, there is no need of the custodial interrogation of the present applicant, this court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant ‘Nadeem @ Shanu, son of Taufiq Ahamed @ Chuttan’ be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 10. It is made clear that after being released on bail, applicant shall join the trial proceedings on each and every date and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, failing which the trial court shall be at liberty to take appropriate legal action against the applicant including for cancellation of bail. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 25.09.2025 SKS