AJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/8769/2025 · 2025-09-12
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164557 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164557 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8769 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Uma Kant, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri S.P. Singh, the learned State Counsel and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.515/2025, under Sections 137(2), 87 B.N.S, registered at Police Station- Mohammadi, District- Kheri. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of F.I.R. lodged on 19.07.2025 stating that the applicant had enticed away the informant's daughter aged about 17 years in the night of 17.07.2025 and she has taken away Rs.8,000/- with her. 4. In the statement of victim recorded under Section 180 BNSS, she has stated that, she is aged about 17 years, she loves the applicant and she had gone away to Shahjahanpur with her friend where, she married the applicant in a temple. 5. The medico-legal examination report of the victim revealed no mark of injury or sign of use of force. In the statement of victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS, she has stated that she is aged about 18 years, she had gone way from her home on her own and the applicant did not entice her away and he has not committed any misdeed with her. 6. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is an innocent person, he has been falsely implicated in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Uma Kant, Shrayansh Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ajay Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
the present case and he has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 22.07.2025. 7. The learned State Counsel has opposed the bail application and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during investigation and charge sheet has been submitted. 8.
Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the consistent statements of the victim recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of BNSS, in which, she has not leveled any allegation against the applicant coupled with the fact that the applicant is a young man having no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 22.07.2025 whereas the investigation already stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant- Ajay Kumar be released on bail in aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: - (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. September 12, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 8769 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench