APHC010218092020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14350/2020 Between: 1. GUNDA VENKATA RAVI KUMAR,, S/O VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, RIO DOOR NO.5-106, KARAMPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KARAMPUDI POLICE STATION, KARAMPUDI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in taking any action against the 3rd respondent basing on the petitioner representation dated 14-07-2020 as per the G.O.Ms.288 / 2010 is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to law and consequently direct the 2 respondent to take appropriate action in the matter basing on the petitioner representation dated 14-07-2020, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to forthwith take appropriate action in the matter basing on the petitioner representation dated 14-07-2020, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14350 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in taking any action against the 3rd respondent basing on the petitioner representation dated 14.07.2020 as per the G.O.Ms.288/2010 is as illegal arbitrary unjust and contrary to law and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action in the matter basing on the petitioner representation dated 14.07.2020 and to pass.…” 2. There is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that a crime has been registered against the petitioner and the same is pending investigation and to divert the attention of the investigation agency, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. He further submitted that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to workout his remedy before the appropriate forum according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 10th September, 2025 RKS