Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 164543 (ALL)

ARTI YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/7775/2025 · 2025-09-15

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7775 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the B.N.S.S. has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge-sheet no.01/2023 dated 20.06.2023 filed in Case Crime No.0173/2023, under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC lodged at Police Station Raunahi, District Ayodhya and to quash the summoning order dated 15.07.2025 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ayodhya. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and were never involved in committing the offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. He added that due to enmity, their names have been planted in the first information report and thereafter they have been charge-sheeted. He next added that due to unavoidable circumstances, they could not appear before the trial below. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Krishna Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Arti Yadav And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) it is provided that in case the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. Further, the applicants will have an opportunity at the appropriate stage to move an application for discharge taking therein all the pleas factual and legal which may be available to them, in accordance with law and the applicant no. 1/Arti Yadav, being a young girl of 23 years, may do so through counsel. In case, such an application is moved before the learned trial Court, the learned trial court shall dispose of the same by a speaking and reasoned order strictly, in accordance with law. 8. The application is disposed of accordingly. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) September 15, 2025 MVS/- A482 No. 7775 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench