PRAVEEN MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT.
/1321/2025 · 2025-09-23
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164540 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164540 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1321 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Syed Ahmad Mehdi, the learned counsel for the applicant, Smt. Shikha Sinha, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No.150 of 2025, under Sections 2/3 of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Aspur Deosara, District Pratapgarh. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the gang chart mentions involvement of the applicant in a solitary case, in which he has been granted bail. The applicant's involvement in another criminal case has also been disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of the anticipatory bail application, in which he has been released bail. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of anticipatory bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has also been stated in the affidavit filed in support of the anticipatory bail application that the applicant is neither a leader nor member of any gang. 5. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Syed Raza Mehdi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Praveen Mishra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. .....Opposite Party(s)
she could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for granting anticipatory bail to the applicant. 7. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant- Praveen Mishra before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court: (i).
that the applicant shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. (iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted; and (v). that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. September 23, 2025 Preeti NABAIL No. 1321 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench