- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7448 WP No. 4715 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO. 4715 OF 2025 (T-IT) BETWEEN: T. NARASIMHA MURTHY S/ LATE THYAGARAJA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT NO.18, 4TH CROSS O. M ROAD, ULSOOR BENGALURU-560008. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKHIL BABU, ADV. FOR SRI UMAPATHI S., ADV.) AND: 1. THE UNION OF INDIA REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT F REVENUE NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110001. 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION) COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND INVESTIGATION HEAD UNDER I. T. ACT, 1961, KARNATAKA AND GA REGION C R BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BENGALURU -560001. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ASSESSING OFFICER, UNIT-II CENTRAL CIRCLE, WARD 1 (3) C R BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7448 WP No. 4715 of 2025 QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. TIMMANNA BHAT, CGC) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT/S TO CONCLUDE THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF INCOME TAX ACT AND PROVIDE FINAL REWARD TO THE PETITIONER HEREIN VIDE ANNEXURE-B (PARA 5.3) AND ISSUE DIRECTIONS FOR THE RESPONDENT/S TO REALIZE THE TAXES WHICH HAVE BEEN ASSESSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT ORAL ORDER Learned counsel Sri.M.Dilip accepts notice for respondent Nos.2 and 3. 2. Heard learned counsel Sri.Akhil Babu for Sri.Umapathi.S., learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel Sri.M.Dilip for respondent Nos.2 and 3. Perused the writ petition papers. 3. The petitioner is before this Court with the following prayers: a) Direct the respondent/s to conclude the due process of law as per the provisions of - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7448 WP No. 4715 of 2025 Income Tax Act and provide final reward to the petitioner herein vide Annexure-B (Para 5.3); and b) Issue directions for the respondent/s to realize the taxes which have been assessed in accordance with law.” 4. The prayers sought by the petitioner is not clear and it would not indicate the relief sought is whether in favour of the petitioner or for some other person. On going through the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is against one individual who has not been arrayed as party. 5. In the above circumstances, present writ petition stands rejected with liberty to file appropriate writ petition with proper prayer. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE NC CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 58