Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16453 (UTT)

NAZIM ALVI AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1120/2025 · 2025-12-01

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Dat e Of f ice Not es, r epor t s, or ders or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:10699 WPCRL No.1120 of 2025 Hon ’ble Ash ish Nait h an i, J. Mr. Ankush Singhal, learned counsel for the Petitioner. 2. Mr. N.S. Kanyal, learned AGA, for the State of Uttarakhand/1 to 3. 3. Mr. Basant Singh, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, learned counsel for the private Respondent. 4. Learned State Counsel has given a statement before this Court that in the present matter charge-sheet has been submitted before the court concerned and the matter has become infructuous. This fact is being admitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner. 5. In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as having infructuous. ( Ash ish Nait h an i, J.) 0 1 .1 2 .2 0 2 5 Nitesh/