KASHI PRASAD, PNO- 840560870 v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/10741/2025 · 2025-09-15
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164525 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164525 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10741 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:-
"(a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to re-fix pension of the petitioner and pay it to the petitioner accordingly in view of the fact that previous pay fixation order dated 20.09.2022 is not in existence and it has been quashed by this Hon'ble Court, vide order dated 24.10.2024, passed in Writ A No.7637 of 2023 (Kashi Prasad Vs. State of U.P. & others). (b) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay arrears of pension and difference amount of post retiral dues (if any) to the petitioner as per his pay re-fixation. (c) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the O.P. No.2/ Finance Controller, U.P. Police Headquarters, Lucknow to pass orders/ take decision in a stipulated time over the letter dated 26.07.2025, forwarded to him by the opposite party no.3/ Commandant, 25 BN, P.A.C., District Raebareli in respect of fixation of pay of the petitioner."
3. It has been submitted that the aforesaid representation has thereafter been forwarded to opposite party no.3 where it is still pending consideration. 4. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.2 i.e. Finance Controller, U.P. Police Headquarters, 3rd Floor, Tower-2, Police Bhawan, Signature Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyanendra Nath Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kashi Prasad, Pno- 840560870 .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Building, Shaheed Path, Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
September 15, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 10741 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench