HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10768 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 26.08.2025 whereby petitioner has been visited with minor penalty of censure entry. 3. Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, learned State Counsel, at the very outset, has raised a preliminary objection regarding entertainability of this petition in view of the fact that petitioner has an alternative and equally efficacious remedy of approaching the U.P. State Public Services Tribunal. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner does not dispute the fact that petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing a claim petition before the Tribunal. 5. Considering aforesaid facts, petitioner is granted liberty to approach the U.P. State Public Services Tribunal for challenging the order impugned. In case any claim petition is filed, the same shall be decided expeditiously. 6. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 15, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Prempal Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench