JAGDAMBA PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/10692/2025 · 2025-09-15
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164503 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164503 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10692 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for payment of interest on delayed payment of retiral dues.
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party no.2 i.e. District Magistrate, District Balrampur or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 15, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhanu Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Jagdamba Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench