ABDUL KADIR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY.HOME DEPTT. SECTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/9016/2025 · 2025-09-15
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164482 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164482 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9016 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State Respondents. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer:-
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the opposite party No.2 to 6 not to interfere in the peaceful living and possession of the petitioner and their family members without following due course of law." We have gone through the array of the respondents and we find that the District Magistrate Gonda, Sub-Divisional Magistrate Tarabganj, Gonda, Superintendent of Police Gonda and the Station House Officer, P.S. Nawabganj, Gonda, have been arrayed has respondent nos.2 to 5 in this writ petition. Although the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of Ms. Safia Begum W/o Mohammad Amin, who appears to have interfered in the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has appropriate remedy of filing a Suit before the Revenue/ Civil Court. The writ petition stands dismissed. September 15, 2025 Rahul Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harsh Vardhan Singh, Uma Kant Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Abdul Kadir .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy.Home Deptt. Sectt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench