SAFAT ULLAH ANSARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FINANCE U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/9093/2025 · 2025-09-16
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164460 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164460 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9093 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard Shri Shivam Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 30.10.2023.
3. Considering the fact that an appeal is prescribed against the said order under Section 56 of Indian Stamp Act, present petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to prefer an appeal.
4. In case the appeal is filed within a period of six weeks from today, the same shall be entertained on merits and shall not be dismissed on limitation.
5. The petitioner would also be entitled to move an application for grant of interim relief in the said appeal.
6. The interim application, if filed, shall be decided within a period of four weeks from the same being filed.
7. Till the decision on the interim application, if filed, no recovery shall be taken in pursuance to the impugned order dated 30.10.2023. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Kumar Pandey, Manish Barnwal, Shivam Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Safat Ullah Ansari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Finance U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
8. It is clarified that the amount required to be deposited while preferring the appeal shall be deposited by the petitioner. September 16, 2025 nishant WRIC No. 9093 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench