2025:JHHC:12550 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 3530 of 2007 --------- 1.Vikash Kumar Roy, Son of Sri Vinod Kumar Roy, resident of Mohalla Kund, Purana Garhwa Road, P.O. & P.S. Daltonganj, District-Palamau. 2. Archana Kumari, Daughter of Late Ramdeo Lal Das, resident of village & P.O. Rasidpur, P.S. Khajauli, District-Madhubani (Bihar). 3. Abhay Kumar Giri, Son of Late Rajeshwar Giri, resident of village-Vivyonpura, P.O. Chetma, P.S. Patan, District-Palamau. ....Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Secretary of Education, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, Ranchi. 3. Director, Primary Education, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 4. Regional Deputy Director of Education, Daltonganj. 5.District Superintendent of Education, Palamau. ....Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ayush Kr. Verma, Adv. For the Resp.-State : Mr. Devesh Krishna, S.C.(Mines)III Mr. Kumar Pawan, A.C. to S.C.(Mines)III --------- 10/25.04.2025 1. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioners to provide them salary of trained scale since all these petitioners have completed a training as per the direction of the respondent-authorities in the year 2002, but till today no benefits has been provided to them for which they are legally entitled. Petitioners have further prayed for a direction upon the concerned respondents to fulfill the formalities/ exam/ test/ interview etc. to provide the trained scale to these petitioners. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners 2025:JHHC:12550 2 submits that he is having no instruction from the petitioners since long and he is not aware as to whether the benefits have been granted to them or not. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the issue involved in this case has already been decided by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Arun Kumar Singh & Ors. Versus State of Jharkhand & ors. (W.P.(S) No. 638 of 2006) and in the light of which notifications have also been issued with regard to the prayer made in this writ application, as such the petitioners must have received the benefits in the light of the notifications. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by giving liberty to these petitioners that if at all the benefits as claimed in the instant writ application has not been given to them even after issuance of the notifications pursuant to the judgment passed in the Arun Kumar Sinha & Ors (supra) then they may approach the concerned respondent. 5. With the aforesaid observation the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amardeep/-