Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 164457 (ALL)

RAM VILAS YADAV AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

CRLA/2943/2025 · 2025-09-15

Saurabh Lavania

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2943 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed by the applicants for the following main reliefs:- "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow the appeal, and set aside the order / judgment dated 03.06.2021, passed by the learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Lucknow, In Criminal Misc. Case No. 596/2021, 'State Vs. Ram Vilas Yadav and others', arising out of Case Crime No. 381/2020, under Section 323, 504, 506, 3(1)Da, 3(1)Dha, Police Station- P.G.I., District- Lucknow, in the interest of justice." 3. After arguing the matter, at some length, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicants to file bail application before the trial court which may be directed to be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty, as prayed for, and with a direction to the court below that if the applicants apply for bail before the court concerned, prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. 6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra) Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Vimal Kishor Singh, Premkant Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ram Vilas Yadav And 3 Others .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) , this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicants apply for bail, whichever is earlier, they would not take any coercive action against the applicants in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained. September 15, 2025 Vinay/- CRLA No. 2943 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench