Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 164452 (ALL)

VIBHA TIWARI v. STATE OF UP THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DISTT. AMETHI AND 4 OTHERS

WPIL/963/2025 · 2025-09-17

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 963 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that despite an order passed on 30.11.2024 under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the same is not being executed. 3. Learned Standing Counsel states that the petitioner has an equally efficacious remedy of approaching the authorities by moving an application under paragraph 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has already moved such an application, which is pending. 5. In view thereof, the present petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file a fresh application for execution before respondent No.3, who shall pass orders thereupon, in accordance with law. September 17, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nandini Pandey, Amarnath Sinha, Bani Barua, Kanchan Verma (Km.) Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Vibha Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up Thru. District Magistrate Distt. Amethi And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench