LAXMAN @ LACCHUMALI S/O SHRI KANARAM @ KANHAIYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5449/2025 · 2025-07-22
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16443 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16443 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:27337] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5449/2025 Laxman @ Lacchumali S/o Shri Kanaram @ Kanhaiya, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Malio Ka Mandir, Panchkuliya Darwaja, Police Station Kotwali, District Tonk, At Present Resident Of 50/120, Pani Ki Tanki Ke Pass, Haldighati, Tonk Road, Police Station Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 22/07/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No. 178/2025 registered at Police Station Karni Vihar, District Jaipur for offences under Sections 305(A) and 313(3) of BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the matter pertains to the theft of certain ornaments. Though, there are 11 cases of like nature against him but in all of them, he has been bailed out. The petitioner is behind the bars since
25.03.2025. Charge sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would
[2025:RJ-JP:27337] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5449/2025] be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Laxman @ Lacchumali S/o Shri Kanaram @ Kanhaiya shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
7. Further, petitioner is directed to mark his presence fortnightly in every month for a period of six months before the SHO, Police Station Karni Vihar, District Jaipur.
8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purposed. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is
directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.
9. If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the Court or the petitioner is found to be involved in similar nature of offence, the same shall alone be a reason for the
[2025:RJ-JP:27337] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5449/2025] trial Court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J pcg/78