HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2955 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant(s) and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant(s) for the following main relief(s):- "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash cognizance Summoning order dated 15.07.2025, issued by learned Special Judge SC/ST (P.A) Act, Sultanpur, in Case Crime No.0107/2024, Police Station- Lambhua, District- Sultanpur, U/S- 308, 324, 341, 504, 506 IPC Act & 3 (1) (da), 3 (1) (dha), 3 (2) (Va) SC/St Act filed as well Charge Sheet No. 01/2024, dated 07.06.2024, filed by police after investigation of aforesaid FIR dated 10.04.2024 lodged by opposite party No.2." 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the applicant(s) and liberty may also be given to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant(s). 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. 6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Anupesh Kumar, Jagdamba Prasad , Rijuta Bajpai Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Nandan Pandey @ Gaurav Pandey And Another .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, they would not take any coercive action against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained. September 17, 2025 Jyoti/- CRLA No. 2955 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench