Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16441 (KAR)

SMT. OBAMMA v. SMT SANNA PALAMMA

WP/3540/2020 · 2025-04-21

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16263 WP No. 3540 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 3540 OF 2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. OBAMMA D/O LATE H OBAIAH W/O S P PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, RESIDENT OF HOUSING BOARD COLONY CHLLAKERE TOWN CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 522. 2. SMT. DODDAMMALLAMMA D/O LATE H OBAIAH W/O BANGARAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, RESIDENT OF NEAR RAILWAY GATE MOLAKALMURU TOWN CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI BALARAJ A C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SANNA PALAMMA W/O LATE H OBAIAH Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16263 WP No. 3540 of 2020 AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 2. SRI H O MANJUNATHA S/O LATE H OBAIAH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 3. SRI H O MAHANTHESH S/O LATE H OBAIAH AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3 AGRICULTURISTS AND RESIDENTS OF MALLURAHALLI VILLAGE NAYAKANAHATTI HOBLI CHALLAKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 522. 4. SMT. T PREMA W/O P SOORAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS HOUSEWIFE RESIDENT OF VALMIKI NAGARA CHALLAKERE TOWN CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 522. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI R.1 TO R.3 ARE SERVED.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 20.11.2019 AND 29.01.2020 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHALLAKERE IN EX.NO.66 OF 2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-F, ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16263 WP No. 3540 of 2020 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER Learned advocate for the petitioners submit that the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also filed a memo dated 21.04.2025 in this regard. 2. His submission is placed on record. The memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16