Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 164408 (ALL)

BABITA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. BAL VIKAS EVAM PUSHTAHAR U.P. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

/10683/2025 · 2025-09-12

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10683 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties no.1 to 6. 2. In view of order being passed, notices to opposite party no.7 stand dispensed with. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner submits that inadvertently incorrect prayer and grounds have been made in the petition and seeks to withdraw with liberty to file afresh. 4. Considering aforesaid submission, petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file afresh. September 12, 2025 Subodh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar Tripathi, Abdul Khabeer Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Babita .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Bal Vikas Evam Pushtahar U.P. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench