PRASHANT YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. DEPTT. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/10667/2025 · 2025-09-12
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164403 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164403 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10667 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents No.1 and Sri Kumar Ayush, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 & 3.
2. At the very outset, Sri Kumar Ayush, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4, on the basis of instructions given by the District Basic Education Officer, Shravasti, states that the order impugned dated 28.07.2025, a copy of which is annexure-1 to the petition, whereby the appointment of the petitioner has been cancelled from the date of initial appointment itself, may be set aside with liberty to the respondents to pass a fresh order in accordance with law.
3. Considering the aforesaid, the order impugned dated 28.07.2025, a copy of which is annexure-1 to the petition, is set aside.
4. Consequences to follow.
5. However, it would be open for the respondents to pass a fresh order in accordance with law.
6. The writ petition stands disposed of. September 12, 2025 prateek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi, Rati Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kumar Ayush (Abdul Moin,J.) Prashant Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench