Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 164398 (ALL)

RAM PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FOOD AND CIVILSUPPLY LKO. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/9051/2025 · 2025-09-17

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9051 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction for deciding the representation dated 14.08.2025. 3. Learned Standing Counsel based upon the instructions states that the license of the fair price shop of the petitioner was cancelled way back in the year 2002 and the petitioner has approached this Court after about 20 years. 4. Considering the statement of the learned Standing Counsel and from the perusal of the representation, which itself shows that the license of the fair price shop was cancelled in the year 2002, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of inordinate delay. September 17, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chanchal Kumar Pandey, Ashutosh Dhar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Ram Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food And Civilsupply Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench