NABIJULLAH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/7888/2025 · 2025-09-17
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164392 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164392 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7888 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. Instant application has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Case No.175/2019 under Section 3/5A/8 Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 and Section 11 of Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act, Police Station-Salon, Bareli as well as against the impugned N.B.W. order dated 18.03.2023 passed by District-Raebareli and impugned Charge Sheet No.38/2019 dated 18.01.2019 arising out of Case Crime No.22 of 2019, under Section 3/5A/8 Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 and Section 11 of Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act, Police Station-Salon, District- Raebareli. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicant are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the instant matter. He submits that the applicants were outside of their place, therefore, they could not know the date fixed by the learned trial court, thereafter, the non-bailable- warrants had been issued on 18.03.2023. He argued that the applicants are law-abiding citizens and they will always be ready to cooperate in trial proceedings. Further submission is that the applicants undertake that they will always remain present before the trial court and would never abscond from the trial proceedings, therefore, submission is that the order of non- bailable-warrant dated 18.03.2023 may be set aside. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State though, has Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Nabijullah And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
opposed on merits, but he has no objection if the applicants are ready to appear before the trial court. 5. Considering the submissions of counsel for the parties in its totality and to meet the ends of interest of justice, the order dated 18.03.2023 is hereby kept in abeyance. 6. The applicants are directed to remain present on the next date before the trial court and they will kept on appearing on each and every date fixed and will not remain absent without application, in writing, with cogent reasons, failing which, the trial court is at liberty to proceed in accordance with the law. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the instant application is disposed of.
September 17, 2025 Mayank A482 No. 7888 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench