Kiran Rawat vs. State of HP and another CMP(M) No. 1484 of 2024 07.01.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Addl. AG for respondent No. 1. Ms. Salochana Rana, Advocate for respondent No. 2. CMP(M) No. 1484 of 2024 Despite reasonable opportunities having been granted, reply to the application has not been filed by the non-applicants. By way of this application, a prayer has been made by the applicant/petitioner to condone 31 days delay in filing the review petition. In view of the fact that despite reasonable opportunities having been granted, no response to the application has been filed, accordingly, this application is allowed by condoning the delay of 31 days in filing the review petition. Review Petiton No. _____ of 2025 Be registered. Notice. Mr. Rajpal Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General and Ms. Salochana Rana, learned Counsel, accept notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2, respectively. List for consideration on after ensuing winter vacation. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 07, 2025 (narender)