VISHNU @ VISHNU KASYAP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND ANOTHER
/2934/2025 · 2025-09-12
Shree Prakash Singh
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164384 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164384 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2934 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Vakalatnama filed today by Sri Raghvendra Singh, Advocate, on behalf of opposite party no. 2 is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Raghvendra Singh,
learned counsel appearing for opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. The instant criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) of SC/ST Act has been preferred with the prayer to quash the chargesheet dated 21.11.2022 in Sessions Trial No. 1089 of 2023; State of U.P. Vs. Raj Vishnu Kasyap, arising out of Case Crime No. 741 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1) dha of SC/ST Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Raebareli and summoning order dated 20.05.2023 passed by Special Judge SC/ST Act, Raebareli, as well as entire proceedings in pursuance thereof.
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the appellant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant case. He next added that due to some misunderstanding, the instant FIR has been lodged against the appellant and thereafter, the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise deed has been reduced in writing on 25.08.2025, which has been annexed as Annexure No. 3 to the instant criminal appeal. He next added that now there is no grievance in between the parties with each other and the criminal proceedings against the appellant is the futile exercise as Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Prashant Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Vishnu @ Vishnu Kasyap .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Another .....Respondent(s)
there is no fate of trial and that is amount to harassment of the appellant and thus, the criminal proceedings against the appellant may be quashed. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no. 2 has supported the version of the learned counsel for the appellant and submits that the parties have settled their dispute amicably through a compromise deed and there is no further grievance of the opposite party no. 2 against the present appellant and the criminal proceedings against the appellant may be dropped. Learned AGA appearing for the State has no objection to the
contentions aforesaid. Now whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the court below as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Accordingly, this criminal appeal is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise deed, requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the same. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the appellant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. For a period of three months, the proceedings initiated in pursuance of Sessions Trial No. 1089 of 2023; State of U.P. Vs. Raj Vishnu Kasyap, arising out of Case Crime No. 741 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1) dha of SC/ST Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Raebareli, shall remain stayed, so far as present appellant is concerned. The trial court is further directed for ensuring the fact that all the parties against whom the chargesheet was filed are present before CRLA No. 2934 of 2025 2
the trial court and a report with respect to this effect shall also be sent alongwith verification order. Office is directed to return back the original compromise deed dated 25.08.2025 to learned counsel for the appellant within a week. September 12, 2025 kkv/ CRLA No. 2934 of 2025 3 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench