Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16436 (RAJ)

SARFARAJ S/O ISRAEL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5427/2025 · 2025-06-12

Anand Sharma V J

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23172] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5427/2025 1. Sarfaraj S/o Israel, Aged About 31 Years, 2. Hasid Khan S/o Israel, Aged About 25 Years, 3. Abid S/o Hakku, Aged About 25 Years, 4. Qayyum S/o Aameen, Aged About 31 Years, 5. Satish Kumar S/o Kishan Singh, Aged About 27 Years, all R/o Buaapur Gadhi, P.s. Kaithwara, Distt. Deeg (Raj.) 6. Asif S/o Rafiq, Aged 25 Years, R/o Jhanjhpuri, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg (At Present Lodged In The Sub Jail, Nagar Distt Bharatpur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 12/06/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioners in respect of F.I.R. No. 63/2025 registered at Police Station Kaithwada District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 303(2) and 61(2) of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act. 2. As submitted in the connected matter, offences alleged against the petitioners are triable by Magistrate. Accused- petitioners have falsely been implicated in the case, whereas, they [2025:RJ-JP:23172] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5427/2025] have not done the offences alleged against them. He also submits that there are no criminal antecedents against them. Trial is likely to take considerably long time, therefore, the accused-petitioners may be allowed to enlarge on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. In view of above, without making any comment over the merits of the case, I am inclined to grant this bail application. 5. Accordingly, this Bail Application is hereby allowed. the accused-petitioners 1. Sarfaraj S/o Israel, 2. Hasid Khan S/o Israel, 3. Abid S/o Hakku, 4. Qayyum S/o Aameen, 5. Satish Kumar S/o Kishan Singh, and 6. Asif S/o Rafiq, shall be released on bail in pursuance of F.I.R. No. 63/2025 registered at Police Station Kaithwada District Deeg on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each along with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the accused-petitioners shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) They shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) They shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) They shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless their presence is exempted by the trial Court. (iv) They shall regularly mark their attendance in the concerned Police Station on 25th day of every month. Concerned S.H.O shall maintain the register of attendance of the accused-petitioners. (v) On repetition of similar nature of offence during trial, these instant bails shall stand automatically cancelled. [2025:RJ-JP:23172] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5427/2025] 6. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise. (ANAND SHARMA (V.J.)),J ashu /96