IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No.533 of 2025 Date of Decision: 22.07.2025 Rajesh Kumar & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting. No. For the petitioners : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate. For respondents No.1 to 4-State. For respondent No.5 : Mr. Prashant Sen, Deputy Advocate General. Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla,Judge(Oral) Learned counsel for respondent No.5, under instructions, submits that keeping in view the career prospects of petitioner No.4 and the family relationship between the parties, the matter has been reconciled between the parties and the informant-respondent No.5. He has no objection in case the present FIR is ordered to be quashed. 2. In view of this statement and the fact that the FIR was registered for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504 and 506 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (in short “IPC”) which are compoundable under Section 320 of Cr.PC, the present petition is allowed and the FIR No. 95 of 2022, dated 15.06.2022, registered for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504 and 506 read with Section 34 of IPC, at Police Station, Dharmshala, District Kangra, H.P. and consequential proceedings arising out of the aforesaid FIR are quashed. 3. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also pending applications, if any. 4. Parties are permitted to produce a copy of this judgment, downloaded from the webpage of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh before the authorities concerned, and the said authorities shall not insist on the production of a certified copy but if required, may verify passing of the order from Website of the High Court. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 22nd July, 2025 (Shamsh Tabrez)