HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7749 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Shri Yogesh Gupta, Advocate has put in appearance by filing Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, the same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record. 3. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following prayer:- "That for the facts, reasons and circumstances mentioned in the accompanying affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court max kindly be pleased to quash the Charge Sheet dated 29.07.2021 submitted by opposite party No.3 arising out of the Crime No.111/21, under Section 498A, 323, 504, 354, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station-Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar and also quashed to summoning order dated 05.10.2021 passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar in terms of compromised." 4. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to certain misunderstanding, the instant FIR was lodged against the applicants and thereafter the parties sat together and has amicably settled their dispute which has been reduced in writing on 09.06.2025. He added that thereafter the applicants filed the instant application for direction to the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Ujagir Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Vijay Bahadur Yadav Ravindra Verma And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) trial Court to verify the compromise deed and in compliance of the order dated 12.08.2025, the verification was done and report has been submitted to this Court vide order dated 27.08.2025. He submits that further criminal proceeding in the instant matter would amount to harassment and thus the instant criminal proceeding arising out of F.I.R./ Case Crime No.111/21 may be quashed. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has also supported the contention of the learned counsel for the applicants and submits that parties have amicable settled their dispute and the opposite party no. 2 has no grievance, hence, criminal proceedings against the applicants may be dropped. 6. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the contention aforesaid. 7. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I find that compromise has been entered into between the parties on 09.06.2025 and said compromise has been verified on 27.08.2025 and, now, as per the statement of learned counsel for the parties, they do not want to press the aforementioned criminal case relating to F.I.R./ Case Crime No.111/21. 8. In view of the above, as the applicants and opposite parties have entered into compromise on 09.06.2025 and no grievance remains to be agitated and as such, further criminal proceedings in the aforementioned criminal case are liable to be set aside in view of the Judgements of the Apex Court rendered in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003)4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation[2008)9 SCC 677]; Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303; and Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab ( 2014) 6 SCC 466. 9. Accordingly, the criminal proceeding of Crime No.111/21, under Section 498A, 323, 504, 354, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar, is hereby quashed. A482 No. 7749 of 2025 2 10. The compromise shall be part of this order. 11. The application is allowed accordingly. 12. Consigned to record. September 16, 2025 Mohd. Sharif A482 No. 7749 of 2025 3 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench