Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 164326 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD IRSHAD AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/8716/2025 · 2025-10-10

Abdul Moin, Pramod Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8716 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1 to 3. 2. No notice is being issued to the respondent No.4 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. 3. The petitioners are aggrieved by the alleged harassment and threats being extended by the respondent Nos. 2 and 3. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Ranjeet Kumar Pathak, Sub-Inspector of Police Station Wazeerganj, Commissionerate, Lucknow states that there was a Finance Company, namely, Tulsi Nidhi Limited, which was functioning, but after having taken money from the investors has disappeared. The petitioners are all Agents working for the said company. As complaints have been lodged by various investors, as such the petitioners are required for the purpose of recording of their statement and for inquiry before the competent authority. 5. Responding learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners are willing to have their statements recorded in Police Station Wazeerganj, Commissionerate, Lucknow on an particular date in order to record their statements. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amrit Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mohammad Irshad And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 6. It is provided that in case the petitioners appear before the concerned authority at Police Station Wazeerganj, Commissionerate, Lucknow on 16.10.2025 at 11.00 a.m., their statements would be recorded. 7. The petition stands disposed of. 8. In case, the petitioners fail to turn up, then appropriate action would be taken by the respondent(s) authority for the purpose of their statements. In case, the statements are recorded and their presence is not required, they would not be harassed in any manner. October 10, 2025 Arvind CRLP No. 8716 of 2025 2 (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench