Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1643 (ALL)

JAIPAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/38542/2025 · 2026-04-01

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38542 of 2025 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Kumar Ankit Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri B.N. Upadhyay, learned brief holder for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed to quash the order dated 25.3.2019 passed by Sessions Judge, Shamli, whereby charge has been framed under Sections 272, 273, I.P.C. and Sections 66, 63 of U.P. Excise Act in Session Trial No. 94 of 2019 as well as quashing the entire proceedings of the Session Trial aforesaid, pending in the court of Sessions Judge, Shamli. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. The instant application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. Office shall return the certified copy of the order to the learned counsel for the applicant, after retaining a xerox of the same. April 2, 2026 T. Sinha Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kumar Ankit Srivastava, Mukesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Jaipal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad