APHC010217812010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11667/2010 Between: 1. M/S S.SRI SAI GANESH BHARATGAS AGENCY, REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR G.KRISHNAMURTHY S.F NO 142,DALAVAI AGRAHARAM NEW D NO 11-38, (OLD) NO 11-134A CHENNAI ROAD,SATYAVEDU ...PETITIONER AND 1. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD, (A GOVT OF INDIA ENTERPRIES) REGD OFFICE BHARATH BHAVAN 4&6 CURRIMBHOY ROAD,BALLARD ESTATE P.B NO.688,MUMBAI-400001 REP.BY ITS TERRITORY MANAGER- LPG J1-J6,PHASEII, SIPOCT 2. DIRECTORMARKETING, BHARATH PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD 4&6,CURRIMBHOY ROAD,BALLARD ESTATE P.B NO 688, MUMBAI-400001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ,order order direction more particualrly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in resorting to appoint the distributors of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd LPG Gas Supply under Rajiv Gandhi Grameena LPG Vitrak,Scheme in respect of 'Varadayyapalem, and Nagalapuram'area is illegal,arbitrary,malafide and violation of principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the respondents not make any appointmen of Distributors of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd LPG Gas under 'Rajiv Gandhi Grameen LPG Vithrak plan 2009-2010 in so far as 2 'Varadayyapalem' and Nagalapuram'area are conecern in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 14766 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant stay of all proceedings in pursuance of the Notification dt 30-3-2010 including the appointment of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd under Rajiv Gandhi Grameen LPG Vithrak plan 2009- 2010 in so far as 'Varadayyapalem' and Nagalapuram'area are conecern in the interest of justice IA NO: 5 OF 2010(WPMP 73950 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 6 OF 2010(WPMP 83708 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 11th September, 2025 cbn 4 222 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.11667 of 2010 11th September, 2025 cbn