HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8712 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Surya Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.280 of 2025, under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 316(2) of BNS, registered at Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on14.04.2025 against 7 persons, including the applicant, stating that co- accused Sunil Mishra had shown a plot of land to the informant and he had been introduced to co-accused Malti Devi. The informant paid money to co- accused Malti but when no sale deed was executed, the informant made an inquiry and came to know that Sunil Mishra had introduced the informant to some imposter and had extracted Rs.3,50,000/- through him. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant's involvement in two other criminal case has been disclosed in para 19 and 20 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, in both of which he has been granted bail. 5. The co-accused Sunil Mishra has been granted interim anticipatory bail by means of an order dated 03.06.2025 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application u/s 482 BNSS No.618 of 2025. Another co-accused Mayawati has been granted bail by means of an order dated 27.08.2025 passed by the this Court passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.8038 of 2025. 6. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application and he has submitted that the investigation of the case is still going on. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Surya Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Deenanath Chauhan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the F.I.R. does not level any allegation of commission of any specific act by the applicant and a co-accused person has been granted anticipatory bail and another co-accused has been granted regular bail, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9. Let the applicant Deenanath Chauhan be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 12, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 8712 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench