AMINUDDIN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO AND 2 OTHERS
/10619/2025 · 2025-09-12
Manish Mathur
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164276 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164276 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10619 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for payment of salary of suspension period of 15.12.2005 till July, 2006 as per direction of the Board of Revenue dated 14.07.2006 and in terms of judgement of criminal appeal dated
01.02.2024.
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to move a fresh representation before party no.2 i.e.Commssioner & Secretary Board of Revenue, Lucknow of which shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon the said authority.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. September 12, 2025 Shahnaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Mohan Pradhan, Rajiv Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Aminuddin .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench