MANSHA RAM v. U.O.I. THRU. DIRECTOR GENERAL DEPTT. OF POST NEW DELHI AND 3 OTHERS
/10611/2025 · 2025-09-12
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164272 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164272 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10611 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. S.B. Pandey, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India assisted by Mr. Varun Pandey, learned counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed challenging punishment order dated 29.10.2020 and the appellate order dated 25.02.2022.
3. However, learned counsel for petitioner on the basis of instructions submits that statutory revision against the aforesaid orders has already been preferred on 17.05.2022, which is still pending consideration.
4. At present, restricts his prayer for a direction to the authority concerned for final decision in the revision.
5. Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case, opposite party No.2 i.e. Postmaster General, Kanpur Region, Kanpur is directed to consider and decide petitioner's revision dated 17.05.2022 expeditiously within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon the said authority. Petitioner shall annex a copy of memorandum of revision alongwith certified copy of this order.
6. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 12, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vaibhav Raj, Yogesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. (Manish Mathur,J.) Mansha Ram .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. Thru. Director General Deptt. Of Post New Delhi And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench