HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8668 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Mohd. Irfan Siddiqui, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State. 2. On an objection raised by learned AGA for the State that in regard to the prayer made in this petition, the petitioner has statutory remedy available under Bhartiya Nagarik Sanhita, 2023, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as may be available under law. 3. To which there is no objection by learned AGA for the State. 4. In view of above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. September 22, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Irfan Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Jyoti .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench