HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9047 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the appointment of opposite party no.6 as B.L.O. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the opposite party no.6 may not be neutral. 4. Without going into the merits of the contention, specific prescriptions are contained in Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Registration of Electors) Rules, 1994. The petitioner may avail the remedy as is prescribed in the said rules, in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. September 17, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Pandey, Keshav Ram Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Rana Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) Commissioner State Election Commission U.P. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench