HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9027 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging an order dated 12.03.2021 passed under Section 45A of the Employees State Insurance Act. 3. The Counsel for the respondent raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has efficacious remedy under Section 75(2) of the ESI Act before the Employee Insurance Court. 4. Upholding the said objection, the present petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to approach the said forum under Section 75(2), which shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. September 17, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abdul Moien Counsel for Respondent(s) : Mayankar Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) M/S Metal Masters Thru. Manager Mohammad Feroz Khan .....Petitioner(s) Employees State Insurance Corporation Sub Regional Office Thru. Its Director And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench