SANTOSH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LKO.
BAIL/8889/2025 · 2025-09-17
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164245 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164245 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8889 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Sagar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Manish Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.855 of 2025 under Sections 18(C)/27(B) and 18(A)/28of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 registered at Police Station- Sohramau, District- Unnao.
3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of a complaint lodged by the Drug Inspector stating that the applicant was found running a medicine shop without a due license. Some medicines were tested and were found not of standard quality.
4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the maximum sentence that can be imposed for the alleged offence is imprisonment upto three years.
6. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application.
7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 14.08.2025, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case.
8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.
9. Let the applicant- Santosh Kumar be released on bail in the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sagar Singh, Shri Ram Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Santosh Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 17, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 8889 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench