[2025:RJ-JP:33863-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 867/2025 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 29/2025 1. Ramavtar @ Ramavtar Singh S/o Ramkishan, aged about 55 years, Resident Of Hanuman Vas, Police Station Kherli District Alwar (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar) 2. Sugar Singh @ Sugar S/o Nihal Singh, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Hanuman Vas, Police Station Kherli District Alwar (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar) 3. Nannu Singh @ Nannu S/o Baney Singh, Aged About 76 Years, Resident Of Hanuman Vas, Police Station Kherli District Alwar (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar) 4. Samay Singh @ Sammi S/o Narayan @ Budlo, Aged About 93 Years, Resident Of Hanuman Vas, Police Station Kherli District Alwar (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar) ----Accused-Applicants Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Satish Khandal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Dy.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 26/08/2025 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the present accused-applicants along with the appeal. [2025:RJ-JP:33863-DB] (2 of 3) [SOSA-867/2025] 2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-applicants submits that the accused-applicants have been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence under Section 302 R/W Section 149 of IPC. 3. Counsel for the accused-applicants has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that accused-applicants were on bail during trial. Counsel further submits that the accused-applicants have been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that the sentence of similarly situated co-accused persons -Jai Singh & Karan Singh has already been suspended by this Court. Counsel further submits that co-accused-Mahendra Singh has caused head injury on the deceased person. Counsel further submits that hearing/disposal of appeal is likely to take long time. Therefore, he prayed that sentence awarded to the accused-applicants may be suspended and the accused-applicants be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 4. Learned Deputy Government Advocate has opposed the suspension of sentence application. 5. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the fact that they were on bail during trial and also considering the fact that the sentence of similarly situated co-accused persons -Jai Singh & Karan Singh has already been suspended and also considering the fact that hearing/disposal of appeal is likely to take long time, we deem it [2025:RJ-JP:33863-DB] (3 of 3) [SOSA-867/2025] just and proper to suspend the sentence of the present accused- applicants during the pendency of the appeal. 7. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicants shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicants be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that the accused-applicants shall appear before this Court on 07.10.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Anu /21