Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 164238 (ALL)

PAWAN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/8655/2025 · 2025-09-18

Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8655 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Anil Kumar Tiwari holding brief of Shri Amit Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. 2. This petition has been filed seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing of F.I.R No. 088 of 2025 dated 09.05.2025, under Sections 420, 406, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Patranga, District Ayodhya. A further writ of mandamus commanding the respondents not to arrest the petitioner in connection with the impugned F.I.R., has been sought. 3. At the outset, learned A.G.A., on the basis of written instructions of Mr. Madan Pal, Sub-Inspector/Investigating Officer, P.S. Patranga, District Ayodhya, submits that after investigation, charge sheet No. 194/2025 dated 10.09.2025 has been forwarded to the Supervisory Authority, who after examining the same, shall take appropriate action. The aforesaid written instruction is taken on record. 4. Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy. 5. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed with the liberty aforesaid. September 18, 2025 VKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Pawan Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench