HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8749 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Syed Tamjeed Ahmad, the learned counsel for the applicant, Smt. Shikha Sinha, the learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.1467 of 2019, under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., registered at Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of F.I.R. lodged on 03.12.2019, alleging that the informant had made investments in Shine City Infra Project Pvt. Ltd. but no return was paid on his investments. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant's involvement in about 50 other criminal cases has been disclosed in para 15 of the affidavit and it has been stated that all of them pertain to the affaris of Shine City Group of Companies. The applicant has been granted bail in 25 cases, he is languishing in jail since 23.11.2021 and the learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that even the charges have not been framed till date. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Syed Tamjeed Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajeev Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that a co- accused person Amitabh Kumar Srivastava @ Amitabh Srivastava, who also happens to be a director of the Company, has been granted bail by means of an order dated 20.08.2025 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.1122 of 2025 by observing that the purpose of getting an under trial person in custody to ensure his availability to face the trial. The trial has not even commenced in spite of more than 4 years having been elapsed since the applicant was taken into custody. 6. The learned A.G.A.-I has opposed the prayer for bail but she could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9. Let the applicant- Rajeev Kumar Singh be released on bail in aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: - (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. September 12, 2025 Preeti. BAIL No. 8749 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench