ROSAN LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. FINANCE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
/10655/2025 · 2025-09-12
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164221 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 164221 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10655 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed challenging provision to the extent stating restoration period of 15 years in the U.P. Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules 1941 as amended by Government Orders and seeking restoration of the commuted pension after expiry of 10 years 11 months or at best 11 years instead of 15 years as provided in the relevant Government Orders.
3. Learned counsel for the parties admit that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by judgment of this Court in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others) and other connected matters decided on 28.05.2025.
4. Considering aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of finally providing that petitioner of this writ petition shall also be entitled to benefit of judgment rendered in WRIT - A No.- 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others
September 12, 2025 Shahnaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arpit Dwivedi, Shivam Srivastava, Subhash Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Rosan Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Finance Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench