HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8931 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction for taking a decision on the complaint made by the petitioner against the Pradhan, annexed as Annexure-5 to the writ petition. 3. The complaint annexed as Annexure-5 does not even disclosed any allegation or cause of action for issuance of directions as sought for by the petitioner. 4. The writ petition is dismissed. 5. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to take such steps as may be advised under law. September 15, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajeet Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Shani Prakash Pathak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Panchayati Raj Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench